video_id_parse_tool_wrapper

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided. Description does not disclose behavioral traits like side effects, authentication, or network usage. Merely states parsing, but fails to clarify if it's a local or API call.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Concise: one sentence plus bullet lists of parameters and returns. No redundancy, but bullet lists are not integrated into prose. Front-loaded with action.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple 2-parameter parse tool with an output schema, the description covers what, parameters, and returns. Lacks examples or error handling, but adequate for low complexity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, but description briefly explains 'source: 视频来源' and 'video_id: 视频ID', adding minimal meaning. Insufficient detail on parameter formats or constraints.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the verb '解析' (parse) and resource '视频信息' (video information) based on source and ID. It distinguishes from sibling tools 'share_text_parse_tool_wrapper' and 'share_url_parse_tool_wrapper' by specifying video ID parsing.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use guidance. The tool name and sibling list imply use for video ID parsing, but no context for alternatives or prerequisites is given.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.