Skip to main content
Glama
yangaiwu

VOD MCP Server

by yangaiwu

Server Configuration

Describes the environment variables required to run the server.

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
VOD_PACKSNo用于裁剪 MCP server 的 packs,例如 core,collect。
VOD_JAVA_API_KEYNo访问 VOD Java 后端的 API key;网关上线后必配,否则 401。无 key 时仍可运行部分只读自检工具。
VOD_JAVA_API_BASENo唯一上游 Java 的 API base URL;网关上线后必配,否则 401。

Instructions

Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.

This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.

Capabilities

Features and capabilities supported by this server

Protocol revision2025-11-25

CapabilityDetails
tools
{}

Tools

Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions

NameDescription
vod_submit_voicesA

提交 agent 产品用户反馈声音(写,需确认)。对接 Java 现有 POST /external/voice/submit(提交即分析)。voiceId=调用级唯一(跨调用不去重保声量,R1);title=用户原文(R3)。缺 key 时自动获取零字段匿名令牌。

vod_devkit_infoA

插件自述(只读,core pack 常驻):版本/commitSHA/宿主身份/安装信息。

vod_auth_statusA

认证自检(只读,无 key 也能跑):报告双后端 key 配置态(指纹非明文)、连通性、环境指向、生效 packs。缺 key 时输出结构化引导(申请步骤)。

vod_list_submittedA

查询本机已提交的声音(只读)。本地账本(cap 200),最新在前;跨机/权威查询随引擎端点(VOD-VOI)。终端用户进度追问由 agent 凭此对账回答。

Prompts

Interactive templates invoked by user choice

NameDescription

No prompts

Resources

Contextual data attached and managed by the client

NameDescription

No resources

TDQS

A3.7/5.0

Scored across 4 tools

Disambiguation4/5

Each tool targets a distinct operation: write submission, local ledger query, auth self-check, and plugin self-description. The only mild overlap is between vod_auth_status and vod_devkit_info, both of which report configuration/environment info, but their descriptions make the split (auth/key status vs. version/host identity) reasonably clear.

Naming Consistency3/5

All tools share the consistent 'vod_' prefix, which aids grouping. However, the suffixes mix conventions: verb-first (submit_voices, list_submitted) alongside noun-first (devkit_info, auth_status), so the pattern is readable but not fully predictable.

Tool Count4/5

Four tools is a well-scoped surface for a focused feedback-submission plugin with auth and introspection needs. Each tool earns its place, though the set is on the lean side.

Completeness4/5

The surface covers the core lifecycle: submit feedback, list locally submitted items, verify auth, and report plugin metadata, which supports the stated purpose. Missing per-item detail retrieval or update/cancel operations, but submissions appear intentionally append-only, so gaps are minor.

Maintenance

ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues