No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 117 tools
Most tools target a distinct resource+action (file vs folder vs web link vs task vs metadata), but there are several near-duplicate clusters that invite misselection. In particular, five AI extraction tools (fields/template/freeform plus 'enhanced' variants) and three AI 'ask' tools overlap heavily, and the six collaboration-creation tools differ only by target type (file/folder) and subject type (user_id/user_login/group_id). Descriptions do help, but an agent can easily pick the wrong variant.
The set follows a strong box_<resource>_<action>_tool snake_case convention (box_file_delete_tool, box_folder_create_tool, box_metadata_template_create_tool), which is highly predictable. Minor deviations exist (box_who_am_i lacks the _tool suffix, mcp_server_info uses a different style, and some names reorder resource/action), but these are rare.
117 tools is far beyond any reasonable agent-facing surface, well past the 50+ 'extreme mismatch' threshold. While the Box domain is genuinely large, many tools could be consolidated (e.g., the collaboration variants, enhanced vs standard AI extractors), and the sheer count makes discovery and correct selection impractical.
Coverage is remarkably thorough across the domain: full CRUD for files, folders, metadata templates/instances, collaborations, tasks and assignments, web links, and shared links, plus users, groups, AI, and Doc Gen workflows. Only minor gaps exist (e.g., no dedicated comment/annotation tools despite COMMENTS appearing as a search content type).