Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate. It adds the meaning of 'order_id' ('The order ID to reissue token for'), which clarifies the parameter's role. However, it doesn't provide format details (e.g., UUID, numeric ID) or constraints, leaving some ambiguity. With one parameter and partial semantic clarification, a baseline 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.