j-platpat-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to j-platpat-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server that enables searching Korean patents, trademarks, and designs via KIPRIS Plus open APIs. Supports keyword, advanced, applicant, and rightholder searches with detailed bibliographic lookup.7102 npm54MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for the Japan National Tax Agency Corporate Number API, enabling corporate number lookup and search via local AI clients.31MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for searching Japanese Diet bills and committee Q\&A records via the NDL Kokkai API.45 npm1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server wrapping the e-Gov law API v2 to search and retrieve Japanese law data, including law lists, revision histories, full text, attachments, and keyword search.62MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for searching Japanese corporate data including companies, financials, patents, subsidies, and government statistics via official government APIs.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for the Kaisha API, providing official Japanese company-registry data including corporate numbers and qualified invoice registrations, with pay-per-call via USDC micropayments.2 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 27 tools
Tools are mostly separated by domain (patent/design/trademark) and resource type, making most purposes distinct. However, near-duplicate pairs like get_patent_progress vs get_patent_progress_simple and get_patent_family vs get_patent_family_list create some potential for misselection.
All tools follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern: get_*, resolve_*, and lookup_* with domain/resource prefixes. Minor noun abbreviations such as doc vs document and app_info are used consistently within families and do not break predictability.
With 27 tools, the server exceeds the 25-tool threshold for 'too many' in the rubric. Although the breadth reflects three domains, the set is heavy and includes near-duplicate progress/simple variants that could be consolidated.
Core JPO retrieval operations across patents, designs, and trademarks are covered: registration, documents, progress, priority rights, citations, family, global/JP documents, and number resolution. Missing search/bulk discovery or some cross-domain utilities are minor gaps that agents can likely work around.