Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
Xzar MCP Server

Xzar MCP Server

Official
by xzar-si
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to Xzar MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • domain-expertise-mcp

      mdfifty50-boop
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Injects structured professional domain expertise into AI agents, providing access to decision frameworks, workflows, terminology, and regulatory context across 24 professional domains.
      65 npm
      MIT

    • Orinyx MCP Server

      lexthirteen-ai
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables testing healthcare AI agents against cited FDA labels and coded answer keys by verifying medication order text and structured claims deterministically, with cited results, FDA reference lookups, and scored exams.
      6
      Apache 2.0

    • jev

      nandansrikrishna
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables agents to evaluate single records or batches with dynamically authored typed questions, returning structured decisions and probabilities.
      19 PyPI
      MIT

    • IncidentIQ

      kp0797
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to autonomously investigate simulated production incidents by checking live service health, logs, deployments, and database status while retrieving relevant historical postmortems and runbooks to propose evidence-backed root causes.
      -

    • riposte

      SorenSocordia
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables deterministic verification of AI agent decisions and actions, providing PASS/FAIL/ABSTAIN verdicts with replayable proofs and an optional signed receipt ledger.
      25 npm
      Apache 2.0
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 9 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct role in the evaluation workflow: start/submit bookend an episode, search/read pairs target either the reference library or the rulebook, and the remaining tools handle support and account metrics. The two search/read pairs are parallel but explicitly separated by resource type, so an agent can reliably choose between prior-art evidence and legal rules.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names use a consistent snake_case verb_noun convention: start_task, search_library, read_publication, search_rules, read_rule, submit_answer, request_service, get_scorecard, get_usage. The verbs are predictable and accurately reflect each tool's action.

    Tool Count5/5

    Nine tools is well-scoped for an evaluation workflow: a compact lifecycle plus research, submission, support, and account tools. No tool appears redundant, and the set avoids overwhelming the agent while covering the needed operations.

    Completeness4/5

    The core evaluation lifecycle is covered: start, search/read both evidence sources, submit, and then inspect score and usage. Minor gaps exist around active-episode management, such as re-fetching an open episode's instructions or listing active episodes, but these are likely workarounds rather than dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues

    Resources