xhs-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to xhs-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for Xiaohongshu (xiaohongshu.com) enabling login, note/video publishing, search, recommendations, and comment management via CLI or MCP protocol.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenance一个用于小红书API的MCP服务器,支持搜索笔记、获取内容、查看评论和发表评论等功能。22 PyPI517MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA locally-run MCP server that enables downloading images, videos, and LivePhotos from Xiaohongshu (RedNote) and retrieving detailed work information through URL-based queries.8GPL 3.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA read-only MCP server for Xiaohongshu that enables searching notes, fetching details and comments, with QR code login support.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for automating Xiaohongshu (RED Note). Publish posts, search content, comment, like, and analyze creator data on China's largest lifestyle social platform.18 PyPI25MIT
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceA lightweight MCP server that lets AI assistants publish notes to Xiaohongshu (Little Red Book) via browser automation. Supports login, image-text note publishing with up to 9 images, and search.41-
TDQS
Scored across 5 tools
Each tool targets a distinct resource and action: search notes, get note details, get user profile, get user notes, and explore trending feed. There is no overlap in their purposes, so an agent can easily choose the right tool.
All tool names use a consistent 'xhs_' prefix and snake_case. However, there is a slight mix between verb-based names (xhs_search, xhs_explore) and noun-based names (xhs_note_detail, xhs_user_profile, xhs_user_notes), deviating from a uniform verb_noun pattern.
Five tools is well within the ideal range for a focused server. Each tool meaningfully contributes to the apparent purpose of Xiaohongshu research and trend analysis without being padded or insufficient.
The server covers the core read-only workflows (search, detail, user portfolio, trends) for market research. Minor gaps exist, such as no user search or comment-level detail, but they do not severely hinder typical use cases.