createSchematicFromTemplate

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It only mentions creation from a template and two types, but omits details like whether it overwrites files, required permissions, error behavior, or return value structure.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise with two sentences, front-loading the main action and adding relevant detail about template types. No extraneous content.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (9 parameters, no annotations, no schema descriptions) and the presence of an output schema not explained, the description is severely incomplete. The agent cannot infer parameter usage, defaults, or expected outputs.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 9 parameters with 0% description coverage, yet the description only indirectly references template_name and the two template types. It does not explain critical parameters like parameters, circuit_name, output_path, sheet dimensions, template_path, placement_mode, or open_ui, leaving the agent without guidance.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool creates an LTspice .asc schematic from a JSON template, which is a specific verb+resource. It distinguishes itself from siblings like createSchematicFromNetlist and createSchematic by mentioning the JSON template input.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage by listing two template types (netlist and spec), but it does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives such as createSchematicFromNetlist or createSchematic, nor does it provide any conditions or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.