Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
GMPSignal Real-Time Intelligence MCP (59 Tools)

GMPSignal Real-Time Intelligence MCP (59 Tools)

Official
by xpayrcom
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Hybrid

ot_ics_scada_exposed_port_vulnerability_radar

Detect exposed OT, ICS, SCADA, and IoT IP ports and associated CVEs, then extract structured intelligence to prioritize vulnerability response.

Instructions

OT, ICS & IoT Exposed IP Port & CVE Intelligence: Real-time structured data extraction feed for OT, ICS & IoT Exposed IP Port & CVE Intelligence.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "ot_ics_scada_exposed_port_vulnerability_radar"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
maxResultsNoMaximum number of structured items to extract.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv1.0.0

TDQS

C2.3/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are supplied, so the description carries the full disclosure burden. "Real-time" hints at live data, but nothing is said about data sources, authentication, rate limits, or whether results are cached versus freshly queried — real gaps for a scanner-class tool with zero annotation coverage.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The text is short, but it is structured as a title-colon-restatement, with the second clause duplicating the first almost word for word. It is compact yet not front-loaded with any actionable information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema and no annotations, an agent cannot tell what a returned "structured item" contains — IP, port, CVE ID, severity — nor how this feed relates to the adjacent CVE and attack-surface tools. The definition is too thin for a vulnerability intelligence endpoint.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Only one parameter exists (maxResults) and the schema documents it fully at 100% coverage. The description adds no semantics about what a result item is or how maxResults affects pagination, so baseline 3 is the ceiling.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose2/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description is essentially the tool name restated twice: "OT, ICS & IoT Exposed IP Port & CVE Intelligence" followed by "Real-time structured data extraction feed for OT, ICS & IoT Exposed IP Port & CVE Intelligence." No concrete verb (list, search, fetch) or scope statement distinguishes it from sibling scanners like shodan_internetdb_zero_key_ip_port_cve_scanner or cloud_perimeter_ip_attack_surface_auditor.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no when-to-use guidance, no exclusions, and no mention of alternative tools. The agent must infer from the name alone whether this overlaps with the Shodan-based or cloud attack-surface siblings.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools