toggle_torch

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Without annotations, the description discloses the basic on/off behavior and the parameter meaning. However, it omits any side effects, permission requirements, or device constraints, which is acceptable for a simple toggle but not fully transparent.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise: one purpose sentence and an Args line. Every word earns its place, and the intent is immediately clear.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple one-parameter toggle tool with an output schema, the description is nearly complete. It explains the core action and parameter. A slight improvement would be mention of return behavior, but the output schema likely covers that.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 0% description coverage, but the description adds 'True to turn on, False to turn off,' clarifying the boolean parameter. While minimal, it provides essential meaning beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Turn the flashlight on or off') and the specific resource ('flashlight (torch)'). It is a distinct tool among siblings, as no other sibling name suggests flashlight control.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as other device control tools like set_screen_brightness or vibrate. No context about prerequisites or exclusions is provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.