Uranium MCP Server
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| URANIUM_API_KEY | Yes | Your Uranium API key from portal.uranium.pro | |
| URANIUM_BASE_URL | No | API base URL. Defaults to https://gw.urnm.pro | https://gw.urnm.pro |
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Server capabilities have not been inspected yet.
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| list_collectionsB | List all user collections (personal, common, and external) |
| list_assetsC | List assets with optional filtering by collection, search, and pagination |
| create_collectionC | Create a new NFT collection |
| create_assetB | Create a new NFT asset from a local file or base64 data |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: create_asset and create_collection handle creation of different resource types, while list_assets and list_collections handle listing of those same resource types. There is no overlap in functionality - assets and collections are separate entities with no ambiguity between tools.
All tools follow a perfect verb_noun pattern: create_asset, create_collection, list_assets, list_collections. The naming is completely consistent with 'create' for creation operations and 'list' for listing operations, all using snake_case throughout.
Four tools is reasonable for an NFT management server, though slightly minimal. The server covers creation and listing for both assets and collections, which represents a solid foundation, but additional operations like updating or deleting resources would typically be expected for a complete CRUD surface.
The server provides create and list operations for both assets and collections, but lacks update and delete functionality. While the core creation and listing workflows are covered, agents cannot modify or remove existing resources, which represents a notable gap in the CRUD lifecycle for this domain.