Retrieve recent product updates, feature releases, and changelog notes for any SaaS tool by providing its slug. Solve the problem of tracking software changes with real-time changelog data.
Get the latest product updates, feature releases, and changelog notes for a specific SaaS tool.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| slug | Yes | Slug of the tool (e.g. 'neon', 'supabase', 'openai'). |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
v1.0.0Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations provided, the description must carry the behavioral disclosure. It states the tool returns updates, features, and notes, but does not clarify whether it is read-only (implied by 'Get'), response format, pagination, or any potential side effects. It provides basic intent but lacks depth.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, efficient sentence with no wasted words. It front-loads the core purpose and is immediately understandable. Perfectly concise for a tool with one parameter.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple tool with one well-documented parameter and no output schema, the description is adequate. It communicates the core action and target. However, it could hint at the return type or any constraints (e.g., only latest vs. full history) to be fully complete, but it's sufficient for an agent to invoke correctly.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description adds no new meaning to the 'slug' parameter beyond what the schema already provides; it merely restates that it targets a specific tool. No additional context is given.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'Get' and the resource 'latest product updates, feature releases, and changelog notes' for a specific tool. This unambiguously distinguishes it from siblings like compare, pricing, and search, which serve different purposes.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The context is clear: this tool is for retrieving changelog data for a specific tool, while siblings handle pricing, comparison, and search. It doesn't explicitly mention when not to use it, but the resource type makes the intent obvious, so no exclusions are needed.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.