Skip to main content
Glama
xinyousuozhi

Academic MCP

by xinyousuozhi

Server Configuration

Describes the environment variables required to run the server.

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
LOSI_API_KEYNoIndividual API key for the LOSI (National Assembly Library Legislative Information) provider.
CINII_API_KEYNoIndividual API key for the CiNii (Japanese scholarly papers) provider.
HISTORY_API_KEYNoIndividual API key for the HGIS (National Institute of Korean History) provider.
ENABLED_PROVIDERSNoComma-separated list of academic databases to enable. Example: kci,oak,kostma,losi,cinii. Default providers include kci, oak, and kostma.kci,oak,kostma
DATA_GO_KR_API_KEYNoAPI key from the Public Data Portal (data.go.kr), required for NL (National Library), KoreanTK, and Eyis providers.

Instructions

Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.

This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.

Capabilities

Features and capabilities supported by this server

Protocol revision2025-11-25

CapabilityDetails
tools
{
  "listChanged": false
}
experimental
{}

Tools

Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions

NameDescription
searchC

여러 학술 DB에서 논문/문헌을 통합 검색합니다. 키워드, 저자, 연도 등으로 검색할 수 있습니다.

get_paper_detailC

논문/문헌의 상세 정보(초록, 키워드, 인용정보 등)를 조회합니다.

list_providersB

사용 가능한 학술 DB 목록을 조회합니다.

Prompts

Interactive templates invoked by user choice

NameDescription

No prompts

Resources

Contextual data attached and managed by the client

NameDescription

No resources

TDQS

B3.3/5.0

Scored across 3 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose with no ambiguity: get_paper_detail retrieves detailed metadata for a specific paper, list_providers shows available academic databases, and search performs cross-database searches. There is no overlap in functionality that would cause misselection.

Naming Consistency5/5

All three tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (get_paper_detail, list_providers, search). While 'search' is a single verb without an explicit noun, it fits naturally as a search action in this context and maintains readability with the other tools.

Tool Count3/5

With only 3 tools, the set feels thin for an academic research server. While the tools cover basic operations (search, detail retrieval, provider listing), more comprehensive functionality like citation analysis, paper recommendations, or database-specific operations would enhance the scope. It's borderline but functional for minimal use.

Completeness3/5

The tool surface covers core search and retrieval workflows but has notable gaps. There is no way to save papers, manage collections, track citations over time, or access full-text content. Agents can work around this by using the provided tools, but advanced academic tasks will be limited.

Maintenance

ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues