CiteGuard
Related Servers
Alternatives to CiteGuard
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for verifying academic citations via Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, and CrossRef.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables AI assistants to verify BibTeX citations and URLs against academic databases like Semantic Scholar and DBLP. It allows users to ensure bibliography accuracy and link accessibility directly within their research workflows.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server for auditing LaTeX citations and numeric claims in academic papers, verifying numerical values against resolved full-text sources.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server enabling AI agents to search and retrieve scientific papers, citations, and author profiles from Crossref, OpenAlex, and Semantic Scholar with no API keys required.53MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that verifies whether a claim is actually supported by the source text at a given citation — independent of what the calling LLM asserts.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that lets LLMs search, verify, and read papers from arXiv, preventing hallucinated academic references.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 7 tools
The suite clearly separates status, citation verification, claim-support checking, and counterevidence search, but check_claim_support_set_tool overlaps heavily with audit_claim_support_tool, which can also assess a claim against multiple citations. Agents may struggle to choose between these set-level support tools despite their long descriptions.
Names follow a rough verb_noun_tool pattern, but there are notable inconsistencies: citeguard_status_tool breaks the verb-first pattern, and singular/plural forms vary (verify_citation vs audit_citations, check_claim_support vs audit_claim_support). The names are readable but not perfectly uniform.
Seven tools is well-scoped for a citation-integrity server: single and batch variants, existence verification, claim-support assessment, counterevidence discovery, and a status/diagnostic tool. Each tool earns its place without excessive overlap at the count level.
The surface covers the core domain well: verify, audit, claim-support check, counterevidence search, and diagnostics. Minor gaps exist—such as no dedicated full-text retrieval or direct correction-application tool—but suggested fixes and user-confirmation flows are described, so agents can work around these.