A
licenseNot graded
qualityD
maintenanceEnables Claude to intelligently organize files by scanning folders, detecting duplicates, suggesting meaningful names, and moving files into logical folders.
MIT
fileman
Related Servers
Alternatives to fileman
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables LLMs to organize and manage Windows file systems with intelligent file analysis, automated grouping, renaming with date prefixes, and safe operations through dry-run mode and sandbox restrictions.1MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceLets AI assistants analyze and organize local directories by file type, with dry-run support and safe sorting.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceA local-first, open-source harness for organizing your files with an AI agent.2MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI-assisted Google Drive organization by letting Claude inspect a workspace, propose a tidy-up plan, and apply it only after deterministic validation, human approval, and audit logging.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables agent clients to index and organize local media libraries by recognizing codes from filenames, querying media, checking library quality, adding files, fetching metadata, and scanning directories, with deletion gated by verified magnet links.2MIT
TDQS
B3.4/5.0
Scored across 16 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool targets a distinct action (list, get, create, preview, apply, scan, etc.) across different domains (jobs, manifest, review rules, inbox). Overlap is minimal, with only 'analyze.create' and 'inbox.analyze' slightly related but clearly differentiated by source.
Naming Consistency5/5
All tools follow a consistent `domain.action` or `domain.subdomain.action` pattern using lower_snake_case. Verbs like list, get, create, preview, apply, scan are used uniformly, making the naming predictable.
Tool Count5/5
With 16 tools, the set is well-scoped for a file management system covering jobs, manifests, review rules, inbox processing, settings, and reports. No tool feels redundant or missing in terms of count.
Completeness3/5
The tool surface covers core workflows (analyze, review, manifest patching, inbox scanning) but lacks execution tools for applying changes (only preview exists), job cancellation, or manifest creation. Some lifecycle gaps exist.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues