xiaobenyang-mcp-2-1
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP_ID | Yes | MCP id | |
| LOG_LEVEL | No | Log level | info |
| XBY_APIKEY | Yes | 你的实际apikey (Your actual API key) |
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Server capabilities have not been inspected yet.
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| get_all_dishesB | 获取所有可用菜品的名称列表 (菜单)。 |
| get_dish_contentC | 根据提供的菜品名称获取其详细内容。 |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools have perfectly distinct purposes: get_all_dishes retrieves a list of dish names, while get_dish_content fetches detailed content for a specific dish. There is no overlap or ambiguity between these operations.
Both tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with 'get_' prefix and snake_case naming. The naming is predictable and clear across the set.
With only 2 tools, this server feels thin for a dish/recipe domain. While the tools cover basic retrieval, typical food-related servers would include operations like search, filter, create, update, or delete dishes for a more complete surface.
The server only provides read operations (list and get details), lacking any create, update, delete, or search capabilities. This is a significant gap that will limit agent workflows, as there's no way to modify or interact with dish data beyond viewing it.