Search-Movie
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| XBY_APIKEY | Yes | 你的实际apikey (Your actual API key) |
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Server capabilities have not been inspected yet.
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| search_movieA | 搜索电影或电视剧资源。返回未验证的搜索结果列表，包含标题、链接和质量信息。使用此工具获取候选资源后，请从结果中选择最匹配的链接，然后使用 validate_video_url 工具验证其可播放性。 |
| validate_video_urlA | 验证特定视频链接的可播放性。接收一个视频播放页面的 URL 或 URL 数组，返回该链接是否可以正常播放。支持批量验证多个链接。只有通过验证的链接才能确保用户可以观看。 |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: search_movie finds potential video resources, while validate_video_url checks their playability. There is no overlap in functionality, and an agent can easily distinguish when to use each tool based on the workflow described in the search_movie description.
Both tools follow a consistent snake_case naming pattern with clear verb_noun structure: search_movie and validate_video_url. The naming is predictable and readable, with no deviations in style or convention across the set.
With only 2 tools, the server feels thin for a movie search domain, as it lacks operations like filtering, sorting, or accessing detailed metadata. However, the tools cover a basic workflow (search and validate), making it borderline appropriate but limited in scope.
The server provides a minimal workflow for finding and verifying video links, but there are notable gaps: no tools for browsing categories, getting movie details, or managing user preferences. It covers search and validation but misses broader domain operations, leaving agents with limited capabilities.