Skip to main content
Glama
xiaobenyang-com

Structured-Argumentation

README.md
# 认知增强MCP服务器 Structured Argumentation

一组模型上下文协议服务器,为大型语言模型提供认知增强工具。
A group of model context protocol servers provide cognitive enhancement tools for large language models.## 工具列表 Tool List

本MCP服务封装下列工具,可让模型通过标准化接口调用以下功能。 本MCP服务封装下列工具,可让模型通过标准化接口调用以下功能。

| 工具 Tool   | 描述 Description         |
|-------|--------------------|
| structuredArgumentation | A detailed tool for systematic dialectical reasoning and argument analysis. This tool helps analyze complex questions through formal argumentation structures. It facilitates the creation, critique, and synthesis of competing arguments.  When to use this tool: - Evaluating competing perspectives and claims - Analyzing complex ethical dilemmas - Assessing policy proposals with multiple stakeholders - Exploring scientific hypotheses and counter-arguments  Key features: - Break down arguments into claims, premises, and conclusions - Track relationships between arguments - Represent objections and rebuttals - Facilitate dialectical progression through thesis-antithesis-synthesis - Evaluate argument strengths and weaknesses - Visualize argument structures  Parameters explained: - claim: The central proposition being argued - premises: Supporting evidence or assumptions - conclusion: The logical consequence of accepting the claim - argumentType: Whether this is a thesis, antithesis, synthesis, objection, or rebuttal - confidence: Your confidence level in this argument (0.0-1.0) - respondsTo: ID of an argument this directly responds to - supports/contradicts: IDs of arguments this supports or contradicts - strengths/weaknesses: Notable strong or weak points of the argument - nextArgumentNeeded: Whether another argument is needed in the dialectic |


## 检查服务 ## Inspector

工具在线测试: [https://mcp.xiaobenyang.com/inspector/1777316659309571](https://mcp.xiaobenyang.com/inspector/1777316659309571)

Online Tool test [https://mcp.xiaobenyang.com/inspector/1777316659309571](https://mcp.xiaobenyang.com/inspector/1777316659309571)

## 服务配置 MCP Server Config


> #### 如何获取 XBY-APIKEY ? How to get XBY-APIKEY ?
> 访问小笨羊科技网站 [https://xiaobenyang.com](https://xiaobenyang.com),注册用户即可获得APIKEY
> Visit XiaoBenYang website [https://xiaobenyang.com](https://xiaobenyang.com), register and get the APIKEY.

### SSE
```json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "认知增强MCP服务器": {
      "headers": {
        "XBY-APIKEY": "<YOUR_XBY_APIKEY>"
      },
      "type": "sse",
      "url": "https://mcp.xiaobenyang.com/1777316659309571/sse"
    }
  }
}
```
### STREAMABLE HTTP
```json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "认知增强MCP服务器": {
      "headers": {
        "XBY-APIKEY": "<YOUR_XBY_APIKEY>"
      },
      "type": "streamable_http",
      "url": "https://mcp.xiaobenyang.com/1777316659309571/mcp"
    }
  }
}
```
### STDIO
```json
{
    "mcpServers": {
        "认知增强MCP服务器": {
          "command": "npx",
          "args": [
            "-y",
            "xiaobenyang-mcp"
          ],
          "env": {
            "XBY_APIKEY": "<YOUR_XBY_APIKEY>",
            "mcpId": "1777316659309571",
          },
          "transport": "stdio"
        }
      }
}

```

TDQS

A3.9/5.0

Scored across 1 tool

Disambiguation5/5

With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion or overlap between tools. The single tool 'structuredArgumentation' has a clearly defined purpose for systematic dialectical reasoning and argument analysis, so agents cannot misselect among non-existent alternatives.

Naming Consistency5/5

Since there is only one tool, naming consistency is inherently perfect. The tool name 'structuredArgumentation' follows a clear and descriptive pattern (adjective+noun), and there are no other tools to compare it against for inconsistency.

Tool Count2/5

A single tool is generally too few for a server's purpose, especially one as broad as 'Structured-Argumentation' which involves complex reasoning tasks. While the tool is feature-rich, having only one tool limits flexibility and forces all operations through a single interface, which feels thin for the apparent scope.

Completeness3/5

The tool covers a wide range of argumentation features (creation, critique, synthesis, visualization), but as a single tool, it may lack granular operations. For example, there are no separate tools for specific tasks like listing arguments, updating confidence scores, or managing argument hierarchies, which could lead to inefficiencies or dead ends in complex workflows.

Maintenance

ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues