Skip to main content
Glama
xhighhongo41

crawl4tools

by xhighhongo41
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to crawl4tools

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • rasterly-mcp

      rasterly-dev
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to read, screenshot, or convert web pages to PDF using a real headless browser, turning any URL into clean Markdown, a visual image, or a print-ready document.
      82 npm
      MIT

    • Crawlberg MCP Server

      xberg-io
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to crawl and scrape websites, converting HTML to clean Markdown and structured metadata with support for JavaScript rendering, bot evasion, and SSRF protection.
      186
      MIT
    • JsonLink MCP Server by mauriblint

      JsonLink MCP Serverofficial

      mauriblint
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to read any web page as clean Markdown, pull title/description/preview metadata, capture desktop, mobile, or full-page screenshots, and list every link or image on a URL. JavaScript-heavy pages are rendered in a real browser and blocked requests retried through a proxy, so agents can reach content they'd otherwise miss.
      5
      MIT

    • Fetchkeep

      rayorole
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to fetch web pages, extract clean Markdown, save and search versions offline, crawl sites within bounds, and retrieve stable citations through MCP tools.
      15 npm
      Apache 2.0
    Deploy Server
    Give agents eyes on the webHosted screenshot MCP. Send a URL, get a pixel-perfect image. $0.002 per grab. Works with Claude, Cursor, and Codex.grabbit.liveAd

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools, `fetch` and `download`, have clearly distinct purposes: `fetch` returns content directly for immediate consumption, while `download` saves content to files. There is no ambiguity in their intended use cases, even though they share underlying capabilities.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tools use consistent short, verb-based names (`fetch` and `download`) that directly reflect their actions. They follow the same naming style (single-word imperative verbs), making them predictable and easy to remember.

    Tool Count2/5

    With only two tools, the server feels very thin for a general-purpose web fetching service. While each tool is useful, the number is at the lower boundary, and many common operations (e.g., batch processing, URL validation, or content extraction options) are not represented as separate tools. This may be acceptable for a minimal server, but it limits agent flexibility.

    Completeness3/5

    The two tools cover basic fetching and downloading, but there are notable gaps: no way to list or manage previously downloaded files, no support for custom headers or POST requests, and no filtering or transformation of content beyond format selection. The surface is functional but misses common needs for a web-fetching domain.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources