Skip to main content
Glama
xhighhongo41

crawl4tools

by xhighhongo41
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to crawl4tools

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • rasterly-mcp

      rasterly-dev
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to read, screenshot, or convert web pages to PDF using a real headless browser, turning any URL into clean Markdown, a visual image, or a print-ready document.
      82 npm
      MIT

    • Crawlberg MCP Server

      xberg-io
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to crawl and scrape websites, converting HTML to clean Markdown and structured metadata with support for JavaScript rendering, bot evasion, and SSRF protection.
      180
      MIT

    • cleanfetch

      belzorash
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to read web pages reliably, returning clean markdown content, hyperlinks, and metadata without navigation or ad noise.
      3
      6 npm
      MIT

    • gander

      abdulkhaliqfarah
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to fetch and extract clean, readable content from web pages, and search within pages for specific queries, without needing a full browser.
      1
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Give agents eyes on the webHosted screenshot MCP. Send a URL, get a pixel-perfect image. $0.002 per grab. Works with Claude, Cursor, and Codex.grabbit.liveAd

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools, `fetch` and `download`, have clearly distinct purposes: `fetch` returns content directly for immediate consumption, while `download` saves content to files. There is no ambiguity in their intended use cases, even though they share underlying capabilities.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tools use consistent short, verb-based names (`fetch` and `download`) that directly reflect their actions. They follow the same naming style (single-word imperative verbs), making them predictable and easy to remember.

    Tool Count2/5

    With only two tools, the server feels very thin for a general-purpose web fetching service. While each tool is useful, the number is at the lower boundary, and many common operations (e.g., batch processing, URL validation, or content extraction options) are not represented as separate tools. This may be acceptable for a minimal server, but it limits agent flexibility.

    Completeness3/5

    The two tools cover basic fetching and downloading, but there are notable gaps: no way to list or manage previously downloaded files, no support for custom headers or POST requests, and no filtering or transformation of content beyond format selection. The surface is functional but misses common needs for a web-fetching domain.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources