Laugh Tale

Overview Schema Source Related Servers Discussions Admin

seek_the_one_piece

Check if all Grand Line stack tools are installed. Reveals the One Piece when complete; otherwise lists missing components.

Instructions

Set sail for Laugh Tale. Reveals the One Piece — but ONLY if every Road Poneglyph rubbing has been gathered (every fruit of the Grand Line stack installed). Otherwise it reports which poneglyphs are still missing.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "seek_the_one_piece"
  }
}

Input Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
No arguments

Output Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`result`	Yes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

First observedv0.1.0Jun 18, 2026

TDQS

A4.5/5.0

Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description fully carries the burden of behavioral disclosure. It clearly explains the dual outcome: success if all items are present, else reporting missing items. It does not mention side effects like destruction, but the behavior is well-described.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description consists of two sentences with no extraneous words. The main action is front-loaded, followed by a conditional elaboration, making it efficient and clear.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given zero parameters and the presence of an output schema, the description adequately covers the tool's behavior in both conditions. No further context is needed for effective use.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 0 parameters, so according to the guidelines, the baseline score is 4. The description adds no parameter information, which is acceptable because there are none to describe.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb 'reveals' and clearly states the tool's purpose: showing the One Piece if all Road Poneglyph rubbings are gathered, otherwise reporting missing ones. No sibling tools exist, so differentiation is not needed.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies when to use the tool (to check completeness of the Grand Line stack) and provides clear conditions. However, it does not explicitly state when not to use it or mention alternatives, though none are present.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools

seek_the_one_pieceA