BibTeX MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to BibTeX MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables academic bibliographic search across arXiv, Semantic Scholar, and Google Scholar with advanced search, citation analysis, and Zotero integration for reference management.2-
- AlicenseBqualityFmaintenanceSearch and retrieve academic papers from arXiv and DBLP databases, with AI-powered prompts to generate comprehensive research summaries, discover related topics, and identify leading authors in any field.225 PyPI2MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables retrieval of academic paper metadata, PDFs, full text, citations, and references by title via Semantic Scholar, arXiv, and other sources.61MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables searching, downloading, and exporting academic papers from 20+ scholarly sources including arXiv, PubMed, and Semantic Scholar. Supports multi-source concurrent search, citation network tracing, and export to CSV, RIS, and BibTeX.1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceProvides local academic literature search and writing support by querying OpenAlex, arXiv, and Crossref, downloading open-access PDFs, extracting IMRaD sections, and appending BibTeX references.42MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables searching and retrieving academic papers from arXiv and DBLP databases with advanced filtering options. Supports downloading PDFs and provides detailed paper information including titles, authors, abstracts, and publication dates.257 npm3MIT
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
The search and search_reference tools both perform literature searches but with different output granularity. While search_reference returns full BibTeX and search returns lightweight snippets, the boundary is fuzzy and an agent might misselect them. fetch and fetch_multiple are clearly distinct in cardinality.
Tool names follow mixed patterns: search_reference uses verb_noun, while fetch, search, and fetch_multiple are bare verbs or verb_adjective. There is no consistent convention, and the verbs 'search' and 'fetch' could be seen as overlapping actions.
Four tools is well-scoped for a bibliographic reference server. Each tool serves a clear purpose in the search-fetch workflow, and the count is within the ideal range, neither too thin nor bloated.
The tool set covers the core search and retrieval lifecycle: lightweight browsing (search), bulk full retrieval (fetch_multiple), and direct full citation lookup (search_reference). Missing features like DOI lookup or format export are minor and not critical for the stated purpose.