leafmem
Related Servers
Alternatives to leafmem
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for brainmem, providing memory search, write, outcome, explain, and status tools to give LLM agents auditable long-term memory. It prioritizes failures, gates writes on surprise, and supports validity intervals for beliefs.Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server wrapping a self-hosted mem0 REST API, enabling memory management with deduplication and mention-aware reranked search.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server providing persistent memory for LLMs via semantic search over captures, structured facts with temporal tracking, and document ingestion. Enables any MCP-compatible client to maintain a searchable knowledge base across sessions.ISC
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceSelf-hosted remote MCP memory server for ChatGPT and AI agents.342MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenancePersistent memory MCP server for AI agents, featuring a visual interface to browse, search, edit, and delete memory. It provides tools for capturing episodes, recalling, consolidating, crystallizing traits, and forgetting, with local SQLite storage and optional authenticated web UI.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that enables persistent, hybrid, local memory for LLM agents, with vector + BM25 search, knowledge graph, and policy-driven retention, providing token-budgeted context injection for AI assistants.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
The four tools have distinct high-level purposes (recall, write, organize, govern), but their descriptions bundle many sub-operations with overlapping concepts. Notably, 'distill active context/experience' in memory_write overlaps with 'distill principles' and 'maintain active experience' in memory_organize, which could confuse an agent about which tool to use for those tasks.
All tool names follow a consistent memory_verb pattern in snake_case, with clear, distinct verbs (recall, write, organize, govern). This predictability makes the set easy to navigate.
Four tools is a reasonable count for a memory management server, grouping operations into lifecycle phases. However, each tool is very broad and handles many sub-operations, which could argue for slightly more granularity.
The tool surface covers the full memory lifecycle: reading/searching (recall), creating/updating (write), curation/maintenance (organize), and governance (update/delete/attribute). No obvious gaps for the stated domain.