Skip to main content
Glama
xcalibur73

WebAudits: Performance & GEO Diagnostics

by xcalibur73

Server Configuration

Describes the environment variables required to run the server.

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
WEBAUDITS_API_BASENoThe base URL for the WebAudits API endpoint (e.g. https://webaudits.pro/api/action). Optional; omitted in some IDE configurations.https://webaudits.pro/api/action

Instructions

Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.

This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.

Capabilities

Features and capabilities supported by this server

Protocol revision2025-11-25

CapabilityDetails
tools
{
  "listChanged": false
}

Tools

Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions

NameDescription
audit_dom_bloatA

Analyzes HTML tree structure of a public URL to report total DOM nodes, maximum depth, div ratio, and Lighthouse threshold violations. Recommends component chunking and shallow nesting fixes.

audit_geo_readinessA

Inspects whether a target website allows AI search engine crawlers (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot) via robots.txt and checks presence of /llms.txt for agentic retrieval.

audit_lcp_traceB

Measures live server response time (TTFB), HTML weight, and inspects for mobile Largest Contentful Paint delays such as lazy-loaded hero images or missing image preloads.

Prompts

Interactive templates invoked by user choice

NameDescription

No prompts

Resources

Contextual data attached and managed by the client

NameDescription

No resources

TDQS

A3.8/5.0

Scored across 3 tools

Disambiguation5/5

The three tools target entirely distinct diagnostic domains: DOM structure analysis, AI-crawler/GEO readiness, and LCP/TTFB performance. An agent can clearly map a request to exactly one tool with no overlap.

Naming Consistency5/5

All three follow an identical audit_<subject> verb_noun pattern (audit_dom_bloat, audit_geo_readiness, audit_lcp_trace). Consistent and predictable throughout.

Tool Count4/5

Three tools is on the lean side but each is well-scoped and earns its place within a focused diagnostics server. A slightly larger set (e.g. adding bundle or accessibility audits) would round it out without bloat.

Completeness4/5

Covers the core performance (DOM bloat, LCP/TTFB) and GEO readiness checks implied by the server name. Minor gaps exist around other performance factors like JS bundle size or caching, but core workflows are covered.