Skip to main content
Glama
xbhog

namebeta-mcp

by xbhog

Related Servers

Alternatives to namebeta-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables domain name availability checking through DNS and WHOIS lookups with confidence scoring. It supports searching across alternative TLDs and generating domain name variations for branding purposes.
      4
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables domain investors, webmasters, and autonomous agents to perform comprehensive domain audits including brand scoring, TLD tier analysis, and DNS connectivity checks, and to generate strategic brand suffixes and industry compound variations for portfolio expansion.
      10 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables checking domain name availability using WHOIS lookups and DNS resolution. Supports both single and batch domain checking with detailed availability analysis.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables users to brainstorm brandable domain names from a description, check their real-time availability across domains and GitHub/npm/PyPI namespaces, and get ranked buy candidates via RDAP.
      4 npm
      ISC
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to vet and rank product name candidates in batch by checking domain availability, App Store and Google Play collisions, exact-phrase web results, GitHub handles and repos, and trademark register lookups.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.5/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With only a single tool, there is no possibility of overlap or confusion. The tool's purpose is unique by default.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The single tool uses a clear verb_noun pattern (lookup_domain), establishing a consistent convention even with an isolated example.

    Tool Count2/5

    A single tool is minimal for a server; while the tool is non-trivial and well-scoped, the server feels incomplete for broad use cases like domain search or management.

    Completeness4/5

    For a pure lookup service, the tool covers the core workflow well (search, availability, registration details). However, adjacent operations like domain suggestions or WHOIS history are absent, leaving minor gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues