Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Engram

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides persistent, local-first memory for coding agents with Markdown as the source of truth, exposed via CLI, loopback API, MCP, and Codex hooks for context retrieval and durable writes.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to capture, structure, remember, and retrieve source-backed memory as local Markdown files, with reviewable writes and no cloud dependency.
      182
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A local-first shared memory layer for MCP-aware agents like Claude, Codex, and Hermes, enabling persistent memory across chats and clients via Markdown files and SQLite FTS.
      6
      2
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A local-first, Markdown-native AI agent layered memory system that provides MCP tools for storing, recalling, exporting, and importing memories with types like working, persona, and fact.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Local, private memory layer for notes and files with temporal reasoning and citation. Enables agents to query and persist memories via the Model Context Protocol.
      12 npm
      2
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Persistent memory for MCP-powered coding agents, allowing LLMs to remember preferences, project context, and decisions across sessions via Markdown files.
      16 npm
      -

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: one retrieves memories, the other stores them. No overlap in functionality.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tool names are single verbs in imperative form, consistent and predictable.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only 2 tools, the server feels minimal but still covers basic operations for a simple memory service. More tools could be expected for a fuller feature set.

    Completeness2/5

    Missing essential operations like updating, deleting memories, listing all memories, and reviewing pending items. The surface has significant gaps for a memory management server.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues