Disconnect Connection

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations exist, so the description carries the full burden. It states the destructive action ('Remove'), but does not disclose side effects, irreversibility, permissions, or consequences for dependent data. This is similar to an 'Update' description that implies mutation without detailing effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, well-structured sentence that immediately states the action and target. Every word earns its place with no filler or redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple one-parameter delete-like operation, the description covers the core action and parameter meaning. However, with no annotations and no output schema, it omits behavioral consequences and usage context, leaving some gaps for an agent to manage.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0% and the only schema info is that connection_id must be a positive integer. The phrase 'by ID' clarifies that connection_id is the identifier of the connection to remove, which adds meaning beyond the schema, though it does not explain where to obtain the ID or any additional constraints.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses the specific verb 'Remove' with a clear resource, 'a connection', and the identifier method 'by ID'. This clearly distinguishes it from sibling tools like connect_block, move_connection, and get_block_connections.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives no guidance about when to use this tool versus alternatives such as connect_block, move_connection, or get_block_connections. No context, prerequisites, or exclusions are provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.