Skip to main content
Glama
xLydianSoftware

XLMCP

by xLydianSoftware
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to XLMCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • synorive

      Aevorine
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides Claude Code with local-first multimodal semantic search across documents, code, images, and video, plus multi-engine web research with active counter-evidence hunting and source-verified, extract-only briefings.
      4
      AGPL 3.0

    • CodeSense MCP

      attaelahi
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides semantic code intelligence to help users search, navigate, and analyze entire codebases using plain English. It enables Claude to perform architectural overviews, bug detection, and refactor suggestions through local semantic search and keyword indexing.
      MIT

    • rag-pipeline

      jansc4
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables Claude to search a local hybrid retrieval index of research papers and ingest new PDFs, providing research-paper memory queryable directly through natural language.
      2
      -

    • code-grapher

      mufasadb
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables Claude to intelligently analyze and query codebases using knowledge graphs, supporting natural language code search, relationship discovery, and incremental updates.
      11
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 33 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Tools are clearly grouped by domain prefixes (jupyter_, knowledge_, project_), and within each group, operations are distinct and well-described. No overlapping purposes between tools.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent snake_case pattern with domain prefix and verb_noun structure (e.g., jupyter_execute_cell, knowledge_index_directory, project_create). No mixing of conventions.

    Tool Count4/5

    33 tools is slightly high but justified by covering three distinct domains. Each domain has a reasonable number of tools (16, 8, 8), and all seem necessary for their purpose.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers core operations for Jupyter notebooks, knowledge management, and project management. Minor overlap between jupyter_connect_notebook and jupyter_start_kernel, but overall no major gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources