get_stream_service_settings

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden for behavioral disclosure. It only states what the tool returns, not any side effects, permissions, or potential security implications (e.g., returning sensitive stream keys). The tool is a read operation, but this is implicit, not explicit.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, concise sentence that conveys the essential information. It is front-loaded with the action ('Current') and resource. The 'etc' is slightly vague but acceptable given the brevity. No unnecessary words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

This is a simple no-parameter getter, so a short description is reasonable. However, it does not specify the exact return structure or mention that settings vary by service type, which could be useful for an agent to know. It is minimally sufficient but lacks detail that would make it complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters and schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline for no parameters is 4. The description adds context by listing examples of settings ('server/key'), which helps the agent understand what the response will contain without there being any input parameters to document.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Current stream destination service type and settings (server/key etc)' clearly indicates this tool retrieves the current stream service configuration. The word 'Current' implies a getter operation, and it specifies the resource (stream destination service type and settings). It distinguishes from the sibling set_stream_service_settings by being the getter variant, though not explicitly stated.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not mention that this is the read counterpart to set_stream_service_settings, nor any conditions for use. The description is purely informational and provides no usage context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.