Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Wave OS MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enterprise-grade MCP server with multi-agent system for business AI transformation across finance, healthcare, retail, and other domains. Provides specialized AI agents for data analysis, API execution, business validation, and report generation with real-time monitoring and observability.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for integrating with Bika.ai platform, enabling AI assistants to perform CRUD operations on databases, manage attachments, and utilize automation and webhooks.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An all-in-one MCP server providing complete AI agent capabilities including file operations, code execution (Python/Node.js), one-click web deployment with wildcard domain support, Excel/CSV processing, and image generation in isolated multi-tenant workspaces.
      133
      Apache 2.0
    • -
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      A sophisticated MCP server providing advanced memory capabilities with RAG, hallucination detection, and enterprise-grade AI infrastructure for intelligent agent ecosystems.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP-native enterprise operations platform that unifies team management, product catalog, order processing, knowledge base, location intelligence, analytics, and DevOps monitoring into a single server accessible from any MCP-compatible AI agent.
      8 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    C2.7/5.0

    Scored across 28 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    The prefixes (theta_, wave_) and resource names help separate most tools, but several pairs are easy to confuse: wave vs wave_send_message both send messages to Wave OS, wave_connect vs theta_configure both configure Theta compute credentials, and read_records vs aggregate_records both query records. The descriptions clarify the differences, but selection is not always obvious from names alone.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Most tools use snake_case and a verb_noun structure, but conventions are mixed: Base44 tools have no prefix (create_records, call_function), some wave_* tools use noun phrases (wave_morning_briefing, wave_triage, wave_meeting_prep), and the standalone 'wave' tool breaks the pattern entirely. The prefixes make the set readable, but the naming is not uniform.

    Tool Count3/5

    Twenty-eight tools is on the high side and heavier than most MCP servers, but the server spans multiple distinct domains: Base44 data operations, Theta EdgeCloud compute/blockchain, and Wave OS assistant/messaging. Most tools have a distinct purpose, so the count feels borderline rather than severely bloated.

    Completeness3/5

    Base44 record CRUD and Theta read/credential operations are well covered, and the Wave OS assistant surface includes briefing, triage, memory recall, delegation, and messaging. However, there are notable gaps: no entity schema update/delete, no memory write tool, and no direct Theta GPU job execution or inference tool despite status and cost-estimation capabilities.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessSyncing