registry_get_persistence

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, and the description does not disclose any behavioral traits beyond the basic action. It does not mention side effects, required permissions, or return behavior. This is insufficient for a tool that likely accesses registry hives.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

One sentence, efficient. However, it is too brief and lacks structured detail like parameter information or return format. It does not earn its place through completeness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema, 4 undocumented parameters, and no annotations, the description is inadequate. It does not explain what the tool returns or how to use the parameters effectively.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description provides no explanation for any of the 4 parameters. Terms like 'software_hive' and 'ntuser_hive' are ambiguous without context about expected format (path, content, etc.). The boolean parameter lacks guidance on what it controls.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it gets persistence mechanisms (Run keys, services) from registry. This verb-resource combination is specific and distinguishes from siblings like registry_get_key (which gets a specific key) or registry_get_system_info (system info).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like registry_search or registry_get_key. It does not specify prerequisites, exclusions, or context-dependent recommendations.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.