free_general_search

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, and the description does not disclose behavioral traits such as rate limits, security, or what the 'safe_search' and 'time_range' parameters do. It only restates parameter names with defaults.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short and structured with a bullet list, but it unnecessarily repeats the schema information without adding insights. It could be more concise by focusing on purpose and behavior.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with 5 parameters, no schema descriptions, and 9 siblings, the description fails to provide complete context. It does not explain the tool's role, parameter usage, or return format beyond 'text content'.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description adds minimal value beyond listing parameter names and defaults already in the schema. There is a contradiction: safe_search type is 'int' in description but 'string' in schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states it is a 'comprehensive search' but does not explicitly define its scope (e.g., general web search) or how it differs from specialized siblings like free_news_search. The verb 'search' is clear, but the resource is vague.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus the many specialized search tools. The description lacks any indication of use cases, prerequisites, or when to choose alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.