Repeat your last successful order with one click. Returns a preview and draft ID for confirmation.
一键复购上次成功订单，返回订单预览和 draftId，确认后调 confirmOrder。
This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.
{
"id": 1,
"jsonrpc": "2.0",
"method": "tools/call",
"params": {
"arguments": {},
"name": "reorder"
}
}| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
v0.1.0Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description bears full burden. It explains the flow (return preview, draftId, call confirmOrder) but does not disclose failure modes, idempotency, or whether it mutates state.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence in Chinese, front-loaded with action, no unnecessary words. Very concise.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given zero parameters and no output schema, the description covers the basic flow but lacks prerequisites (e.g., must have a last successful order) and error conditions.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters in schema; description adds contextual meaning for the no-input action. Baseline 4 applies as no param documentation needed.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description specifies '一键复购上次成功订单' (one-click repurchase last successful order), a clear verb+resource. It distinguishes from sibling tools like confirmOrder and quickOrder.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
States that this is for quickly repurchasing the last order and that after getting a draftId, one should call confirmOrder. Implicitly distinguishes from quickOrder for new orders, but no explicit when-not.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.