origin_concat_worksheets

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It discloses the concatenation behavior, axis effect, and output behavior (overwrite vs new sheet). However, it does not mention potential side effects, data type alignment issues, or error conditions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Four sentences with no wasted words. Uses technical terms succinctly (SQL UNION ALL) and front-loaded structure: verb first, then parameters and options.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, reducing the need to explain return values. The description covers all six parameters, axis behavior, and output writing. Slight gaps remain about default behavior of axis and handling of invalid inputs, but overall adequate for a moderately complex tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, so the description adds substantial meaning: it explains 'others' as a list of book/sheet objects, axis options with SQL UNION ALL analogy, and output parameters for avoiding overwrite. This fully compensates for the missing schema descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool concatenates worksheets, specifies the primary worksheet and others, and explains two axis options. It distinguishes from siblings like origin_merge_worksheets by detailing specific behavior (rows vs columns stacking).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It provides guidance on when to use rows vs columns and mentions output options to avoid overwriting. However, it does not explicitly advise against using this tool when other concatenation or merge tools might be more appropriate, nor does it list prerequisites.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.