social_twitter

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description includes pricing and free tier details, which is useful but insufficient. No information on data freshness, rate limits, authentication, or other behavioral traits. With no annotations, the description falls short.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short but not front-loaded with purpose. It mixes pricing and URL without clear structure. Could be more focused.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with no output schema and minimal annotations, the description lacks essential context such as return format, query expectations, and limitations. Incomplete for reliable agent use.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% (one parameter with description). The tool description does not mention the parameter, so it adds no value beyond the schema. Baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states 'Twitter/X数据' indicating Twitter data, but does not specify the action (search, retrieve, etc.) or the exact resource. It is too vague to distinguish from sibling social tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance provided on when to use this tool versus other social media tools (e.g., social_instagram, social_telegram). No context for appropriate usage.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.