github-mcp-server-js
Related Servers
Alternatives to github-mcp-server-js
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables GitHub API operations such as managing repositories, issues, and pull requests through natural language.397 npmISC
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables natural language interaction with GitHub, supporting operations like creating repositories, issues, commits, and listing repositories or issues.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that enables AI agents to perform GitHub operations like creating repositories, issues, and commits through natural language.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that connects to the GitHub API to list and create issues, comment on issues, and list pull requests with diff summaries. It enables natural language management of GitHub repositories from MCP-compatible clients.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables Git repository operations and GitHub PR workflows, allowing users to manage repositories, create branches, commit changes, and create pull requests through natural language.2-
- FlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that lets AI agents interact with GitHub using natural language, supporting operations like creating repositories, issues, and commits.5-
TDQS
Scored across 108 tools
Each tool maps to a distinct GitHub REST endpoint and resource type; even dense areas like workflow runs and packages use precise noun phrases (e.g. list_workflow_run_jobs vs list_workflow_runs) that prevent confusion. The only near-overlaps (list_issues vs search_issues) are clearly disambiguated by repository-scoped vs global search semantics.
All tool names follow a consistent lower_snake_case verb_noun pattern, with list_ for collection reads and get_ for single-item reads, and mutation verbs (create, update, delete, add, remove, merge, cancel, rerun) used predictably. Longer names like add_or_update_team_membership remain readable and aligned with the overall convention.
At 108 tools, this is far beyond the 16-25 'heavy' range and falls squarely into the 'extreme mismatch (50+ tools)' category. The sheer number creates an overwhelming selection surface for agents, even though each tool is individually well-described.
Coverage is broad across repos, issues, PRs, workflows, gists, packages, advisories, and codespaces, with many full CRUD lifecycles present. However, there are notable missing operations: no create/update/delete repository, no releases, no alert state mutations (e.g. dismiss), and ProjectsV2 access is read-only.