Skip to main content
Glama
wudpecker

Worth Sending

Official
by wudpecker
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Worth Sending

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • BytesJev PlanningChecker

      bennyp11
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents to submit their original request, proposed plan items, and observed repository conventions for per-item necessity scoring before making edits. It returns advisory keep, simplify, or review recommendations with reasons and evidence, without blocking or modifying the plan.
      1
      3 npm
      MIT

    • Lodging Decision MCP Server

      Scenic-Stay
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Lets agents submit a traveler profile, trip context, and candidate listings to receive a deterministic, evidence-backed recommendation with score breakdowns, tradeoffs, risk flags, missing information, and confidence. It handles non-sensitive decision categories only and does not search inventory, book, transact, or persist data.
      MIT

    • Agentic Cold Email Outreach

      Alpha-Park
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables users to evaluate cold email copy for spam heuristics, formatting ratios, unsubscribe compliance, and readability, returning a composite spam score, deliverability tier, flags, and recommendations to improve primary inbox placement.
      7
      -

    • inbound-guard

      analyzemail
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables an agent that reads a person's inbox to check a raw or .eml message and receive a 0-100 cold-outreach score with the reasons behind it. The agent can then avoid replying on the person's behalf to a cold message, or surface a likely cold one with its signals for the person to judge.
      410 npm
      MIT

    • bot-tells

      askeleven
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables an agent to check its own drafted messages for the wording, leaked placeholders, and chat wrappers that make readers think a bot wrote them, returning a verdict, 0-100 score, and per-finding suggestions. It also applies the safe fixes that need no judgement and reports what still requires a human or model rewrite before anything is sent.
      35 npm
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: one retrieves the rubric, the other performs the evaluation. The descriptions explicitly state that the rubric should be read first, eliminating any confusion about which tool to use when.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tool names follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern: get_message_rubric and evaluate_message. The slight variation in noun phrase length does not break the predictable convention.

    Tool Count4/5

    With only 2 tools, the set is slightly below the typical 3-15 range, but each tool is essential for the server's narrow purpose. The minimal count is justified by the focused workflow of fetching a rubric and then evaluating a message.

    Completeness5/5

    The two tools cover the full lifecycle for evaluating a message: obtaining the rubric and performing the assessment. No obvious operations are missing for the stated domain, and the server explicitly does not dispatch messages, so no send tool is needed.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources