F
licenseNot graded
qualityC
maintenanceChecks draft support replies for missing policy disclosures that the customer's situation makes relevant, returning a pass/gap verdict with suggestions.
-
Worth Sending
Officialby wudpecker
Related Servers
Alternatives to Worth Sending
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenancePre-flight scoring for AI agents, returns Accelerate, Fix, or Stop with EUR value range, decision confidence, and pace-layer drag.8MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceDeterministically evaluates whether a proposed agent spend action matches a supplied policy, returning ELIGIBLE, DENY, or STEP_UP with stable reason codes. Provides local policy evidence only, not payment authorization.134MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceTurns an unstructured business note into deterministic, explainable signals for revenue, automation, risk, urgency, and data, returning a score, priority, evidence, and a suggested next action. This lets an AI assistant assess and prioritize business opportunities through an auditable, locally computed tool.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables analyzing call transcripts, scoring dimensions against declarative rubrics, and listing rubrics, for evidence-backed conversation evaluation.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to analyze whether they should send an email, evaluating passive aggression and regret probability with a recommendation heavily weighted toward no.131MIT
TDQS
A4.2/5.0
Scored across 2 tools
Disambiguation5/5
The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: one retrieves the rubric, the other performs the evaluation. The descriptions explicitly state that the rubric should be read first, eliminating any confusion about which tool to use when.
Naming Consistency5/5
Both tool names follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern: get_message_rubric and evaluate_message. The slight variation in noun phrase length does not break the predictable convention.
Tool Count4/5
With only 2 tools, the set is slightly below the typical 3-15 range, but each tool is essential for the server's narrow purpose. The minimal count is justified by the focused workflow of fetching a rubric and then evaluating a message.
Completeness5/5
The two tools cover the full lifecycle for evaluating a message: obtaining the rubric and performing the assessment. No obvious operations are missing for the stated domain, and the server explicitly does not dispatch messages, so no send tool is needed.
Maintenance
ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues