Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to TruthGate MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables local security scanning and compliance gap analysis for code and text, detecting secrets, PII, and OWASP vulnerabilities, and assessing readiness across major frameworks like NCA, ISO 27001, NIST CSF, and SOC 2.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding tools to scan projects for security vulnerabilities, hardcoded secrets, injection flaws, and privacy violations with 699 rules and 76 MCP tools, all running locally with zero telemetry.
      4 npm
      7
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding assistants to scan every file they write before it reaches disk, blocking CRITICAL and HIGH security findings at generation time. Covers secrets, GitHub Actions AI-agent surfaces, prompt injection, Docker, Terraform, and package supply-chain risks.
      30 PyPI
      2
      -
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables pre-execution security checks and sandboxed execution for AI agent workflows, including prompt-injection detection, MCP rugpull and sampling abuse protection, untrusted tool-output sanitization, loop circuit breaking, SQL AST validation, PII redaction, and ephemeral Python execution.
      8
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The three functional guardrail tools have clearly distinct purposes: masking sensitive context, checking test integrity, and inspecting actions. The upgrade_pro_credits tool is also clearly different, but it is a commercial action rather than a guardrail operation, which slightly reduces set-level coherence.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names use the same truthgate_ prefix and consistent snake_case verb_noun structure. The pattern is predictable across all four tools.

    Tool Count4/5

    Four tools is a reasonable size for a focused guardrail server, and the three core safety tools are well-scoped. However, one slot is occupied by a Pro credit purchase tool rather than a functional operational capability.

    Completeness3/5

    The server covers three important safety checks, but it lacks tools for configuring policies, retrieving audit logs, or checking license/audit status. The upgrade tool references audit logs and priority guardrails without exposing corresponding operational tools.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues