user-review-mcp
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| get-user-reviewA | Get a user review of the work that was completed. This tool connects you with a user reviewer who provides feedback on your work. It helps ensure quality and catches potential issues. When to use this tool:
The review will provide honest, critical feedback to help improve the work. |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 1 tool
With only one tool, there is no ambiguity between tools. The tool's purpose is clearly described.
The single tool uses a consistent verb_noun pattern ('get-user-review'), though with only one tool, consistency is trivial.
A single tool for user reviews seems too few. A more complete set would include tools for creating, listing, or updating reviews.
Missing obvious operations like submitting a review, listing reviews, or getting specific reviews. The current tool only retrieves a review, which is insufficient for a full review workflow.