whatsapp_block_contact
Block a WhatsApp contact by providing their JID to prevent messages and calls.
Instructions
Block a contact.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | Contact JID to block |
Block a WhatsApp contact by providing their JID to prevent messages and calls.
Block a contact.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | Contact JID to block |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, and the description adds no behavioral traits beyond the name. The agent gets no information about side effects, permissions, reversibility, or what happens after blocking.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is extremely concise (three words), which is appropriate for a simple operation. However, it could include a bit more context without becoming verbose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a tool that mutates state, the description lacks essential context about effects (e.g., whether messages are hidden, whether the action is reversible). Given no output schema, more explanation is needed.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema covers 100% of the parameter with a description ('Contact JID to block'), and the tool description does not add any additional meaning beyond that. Baseline score applies.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Block a contact.' is a specific verb+resource that clearly indicates the action, and it distinguishes this tool from its sibling 'whatsapp_unblock_contact'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool, what prerequisites are needed, or when to consider alternatives like unblock. Usage context is entirely absent.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/wsapi-chat/wsapi-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server