get_legal_to_daily

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description must disclose behavior. It only states the mapping purpose, with no details about side effects, authentication needs, rate limits, or whether it uses an external API (though apiKey param hints at this). Minimal transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely concise: one short sentence with a contextual prefix. No redundant information, well front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema, so description should clarify return behavior (e.g., single mapping or multiple). It does not specify what the tool returns, how ambiguous terms are handled, or any pagination/formatting. Incomplete for a tool with a required parameter.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so description adds limited value. The description does not elaborate on parameters beyond what the schema already provides (e.g., example for legalTerm is in schema). Baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool maps legal terms to everyday terms, using '[지식베이스]' to indicate a knowledge base. It implicitly distinguishes from siblings like 'get_daily_to_legal' (reverse mapping) by focusing on legal-to-daily direction.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is implied: use when you have a legal term and need a daily equivalent. However, there is no explicit guidance on when not to use it or mention of alternatives like 'get_legal_term_detail' or 'get_daily_to_legal'.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.