A
licenseB
qualityA
maintenanceA meta-MCP server that manages and aggregates other MCP servers, enabling LLMs to dynamically extend their own capabilities by searching for, adding, and configuring tool servers.
16
66 PyPI
142
AGPL 3.0
MCP-MCP
by wojtyniak
Related Servers
Alternatives to MCP-MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server that exposes a curated database of generative AI tools as four tools an AI assistant can query directly, enabling searches without relying on model knowledge.41MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA meta-MCP server that acts as a universal gateway, allowing users to discover and execute tools from thousands of other MCP servers through semantic search. It dynamically loads servers on demand and provides standardized functions for searching, discovering, and running tools across the entire MCP ecosystem.6-
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceA meta MCP server that scales LLMs to 1000+ servers via automatic routing, without exposing all servers and tools directly.317-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables AI agents to automatically discover, install, and learn to use new tools without manual configuration.27 npm17MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA proxy server that unifies multiple MCP servers, enabling seamless tool, prompt, and resource management via the MetaMCP App.46 npm155Apache 2.0
TDQS
A4.1/5.0
Scored across 1 tool
Disambiguation5/5
Only one tool exists, so there is no possibility of confusion between tools. The tool's purpose is clearly defined as searching for MCP servers.
Naming Consistency5/5
The single tool name follows a clear verb_noun pattern (find_mcp_tool). With only one tool, there is no inconsistency or mixed conventions to penalize.
Tool Count3/5
The server has only one tool, which feels thin for a server that could reasonably support additional discovery-related operations. However, given its narrow meta-purpose of finding MCP servers, the count is borderline but not unreasonable.
Completeness4/5
The tool fully covers the search-and-return README workflow for its stated purpose. Minor gaps exist, such as the inability to list all available servers or filter by category, but these are not essential for the core functionality.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues