ontology-atlas
Related Servers
Alternatives to ontology-atlas
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceTurns local code repositories into a queryable dependency graph built from AST parsing and git co-edit history, then exposes it alongside an Obsidian vault as persistent memory. Enables context retrieval, impact analysis of proposed changes, and curation of durable prose knowledge through full-text search and Personalized PageRank classification—all fully offline without API keys or embeddings.30-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to read and write a local-first knowledge base of plain markdown files in git, with governance gates for safe, hash-anchored edits.1Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to build and maintain a shared, git-backed Markdown wiki: they search, file, update and link notes with YAML frontmatter, keep verbatim sources, and optionally read code repos, so knowledge one assistant records is available to all the others. Runs without LLM calls, embeddings or a database, with the vault's own files defining page types, instructions and tools.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceLocal-first engineering memory and code-graph tools for coding agents. Supports private session handoffs, code-cited knowledge, repository graph inspection, and optional Git-backed team sharing.81 npm24AGPL 3.0
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceSelf-hostable, markdown-native team wiki with a built-in MCP server: agents search, read, and write your wiki pages (ranked Postgres full-text + semantic search, backlink traversal). Plus Atlas, which auto-generates a cited, coverage-checked wiki from your git repos and Jira.4170AGPL 3.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceTransforms a folder of Markdown files into a structured, version-controlled knowledge base with semantic search and safe AI editing via draft branches.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 40 tools
Many tools have distinct purposes (validate_wiki vs validate_vault, add_concept vs add_concepts), but the graph-query surface is genuinely overlapping: query_concepts, query_ontology.match_nodes, query_ontology.facets, list_concepts, and find_neighbors all filter/walk nodes, and compile_ontology vs query_ontology have a blurry compile-vs-read boundary. The very long descriptions try hard to carve boundaries, which helps, but an agent could still misselect among the traversal/query tools.
The vast majority follow a clean verb_noun snake_case pattern (get_concept, add_relations, find_path, validate_vault, patch_concept), with consistent singular/plural batch pairs. A few outliers break the verb-first pattern (git_snapshot, git_status, git_history, connection_info), which are minor deviations rather than chaos.
40 tools is well above the 25+ 'too many' threshold for the rubric. The batch variants and code-analysis tools each earn some place, but a monolithic query_ontology with ~35 embedded operations plus overlapping standalone query tools indicates the surface is over-expanded rather than tightly scoped.
Lifecycle coverage is unusually thorough: concept CRUD plus rename/reclassify/merge/delete, relation add/remove/replace, batch variants, git state, validation, compile, code analysis, project binding, and source reading. Minor gaps remain (e.g., no bulk-delete/bulk-move for concepts), but there are few obvious dead ends.