No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 17 tools
The tools fall into clear clusters (papers, provider docs, metrics, entities, web) and most have distinct purposes. A few pairs could be confused at a glance—read_paper vs get_paper (full text vs metadata), forget_paper vs purge_library (one paper vs whole library)—but the descriptions disambiguate them well.
Every tool follows a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern (read_paper, resolve_entity, search_docs, list_metrics, get_metric). There are no camelCase or mixed-convention outliers.
Seventeen tools is on the heavier side, but the surface splits cleanly across papers, provider docs, metrics, entity resolution, and web reading, and each tool has a defensible job. Nothing appears redundant enough to prune.
The paper lifecycle is well covered (search, get, read, add local, forget, purge, quote-match), and provider docs plus metric cards have sensible list/resolve/get/search/request coverage. Minor gaps exist—no batch entity-matching or citation export—but they are workable around.