clear_console

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description discloses it is a placeholder implementation, which suggests limited or incomplete functionality. With no annotations, the description carries the behavioral disclosure burden; it partially addresses it but lacks specifics on what happens when called (e.g., whether it truly clears logs or does nothing).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, concise sentence that is front-loaded with the key action. However, it omits usage guidance and behavioral details, which would improve value without adding much length.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has no parameters, no output schema, and a straightforward action, the description is minimally complete. The placeholder note adds necessary context about reliability, but it does not explain the impact (e.g., logs are lost) or whether the tool is functional. Sibling tools like get_console_logs provide related context but description could be more complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

There are no parameters, and the schema coverage is 100% (trivially). The description adds no parameter information, but baseline for zero parameters is 4. The action is simple with no inputs, so no additional semantics needed.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action 'Clear console' and includes the verb 'clear' with resource 'console'. It is distinct from sibling tools like get_console_logs. However, the note '(placeholder implementation)' may reduce confidence and clarity about actual functionality.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, or any prerequisites. The description does not mention context or exclusions, leaving the agent without direction beyond the basic action.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.