law-ontology-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to law-ontology-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables querying Korean legal knowledge graph with 160K precedents and 130K statutes via MCP tools for relation exploration and semantic search.71MIT
- FlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI systems to search, retrieve, and analyze Korean legal information from the National Law Information API (law.go.kr), including laws, administrative rules, English translations, and law-ordinance linkages.262-
- -licenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceEnables searching and retrieving Korean legal information including laws, court precedents, legal interpretations, and local ordinances from the Korean National Law Information Center API with intelligent search ranking.-
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables natural language search and retrieval of Korean laws, precedents, administrative rules, and legal terms, with deep legal chain analysis and full-text access. Supports stdio and streamable-http transports for local and remote deployment.10MIT
- AlicenseCqualityBmaintenanceEnables searching, comparing, and analyzing Korean laws and public institution regulations through natural language, integrating 110 MCP tools covering statutes, precedents, and internal rules.100107 npm20MIT
- FlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for Korean National Law Information. Enables searching and retrieving Korean laws, English-translated laws, administrative rules, court precedents, and constitutional decisions via 54 MCP tools.54-
TDQS
Scored across 8 tools
Most tools have distinct purposes, but the search variants (search_law, search_by_agency, search_by_region, list_laws) could potentially be confused since they all retrieve laws with different filters. The descriptions help clarify, and execute_sparql, get_statistics, and visualize_law_network are clearly distinct.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern using lowercase and underscores (search_law, get_law_detail, search_by_agency, etc.). The naming consistently reflects the action and target, making the API predictable.
With 8 tools, the server is well-scoped for a law ontology domain. Each tool serves a specific purpose, and there is no unnecessary bloat or overly sparse coverage.
The tool set covers the full spectrum of read-only law ontology interactions: searching, filtering by agency/region, listing by type, retrieving details, viewing statistics, running arbitrary SPARQL queries, and visualizing relationships. No obvious gaps for the stated purpose.