Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to limai

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides persistent memory for MCP-compatible agents (like Copilot CLI) to save and recall knowledge across sessions, plus long-running monitoring tools.
      9
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Local-first memory MCP server that captures macOS screen and app context into persistent Markdown, enabling any tool-capable LLM agent to query its working history.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Exposes MCP tools that give desktop agents durable two-tier memory with recall and graph traversal, project code intelligence (symbol lookup, impact walking, notes search), and web search with page-to-Markdown conversion. It also runs a local model gateway that routes Anthropic- and OpenAI-shaped traffic across providers with usage accounting.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An all-in-one MCP server that enables AI agents with local system capabilities like filesystem navigation, command execution, desktop automation, and a continuity memory suite for persistent cross-session project context.
      37
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 21 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct resource and action—monitoring (screen, windows, clipboard, heartbeat), memory (add/search/list/forget), todo (add/list/update), web (search/fetch), and filesystem (ls/read/write/edit/find/grep). There is no meaningful overlap; even fs_write vs fs_edit are clearly separated by create/overwrite vs precise replacement.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent 'domain_action' pattern with snake_case (e.g., memory_add, web_fetch, fs_grep). The verb is consistently after the domain, and every name is lowercase, making the API predictable and easy to navigate.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 21 tools, the server is slightly above the ideal range but each tool serves a clear purpose across multiple domains (system monitoring, memory, todos, web, filesystem). The count is justified given the broad scope, though a few tools could potentially be consolidated without losing clarity.

    Completeness3/5

    The server covers most core operations for its domains—memory and todo have full CRUD-ish coverage, web has search and fetch, and filesystem has read/write/edit/find/grep. However, the absence of a file deletion tool (e.g., fs_delete) leaves the filesystem incomplete, and there is no explicit tool for renaming or moving files. This gap could cause agent failures when cleanup is required.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues