limai
Related Servers
Alternatives to limai
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceProvides persistent memory for MCP-compatible agents (like Copilot CLI) to save and recall knowledge across sessions, plus long-running monitoring tools.9-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceLocal-first memory MCP server that captures macOS screen and app context into persistent Markdown, enabling any tool-capable LLM agent to query its working history.MIT
- FlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceAn all-in-one MCP server that enables AI agents with local system capabilities like filesystem navigation, command execution, desktop automation, and a continuity memory suite for persistent cross-session project context.37-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenancePersonal AI cognitive exobrain server providing long-term, emotionally-tagged memory and task management for LLMs via MCP.1MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA personal desktop automation MCP server providing tools for screen/mouse/keyboard control, Windows UI automation, headless browser automation, file management, app execution, clipboard management, and a personal SQLite database for todos, notes, and habits.-
- AlicenseCqualityCmaintenanceUnified durable team memory MCP server with tools for session management, task tracking, handoff protocol, and search, plus a multi-provider LLM client.8MIT
TDQS
Scored across 21 tools
Each tool targets a distinct resource and action—monitoring (screen, windows, clipboard, heartbeat), memory (add/search/list/forget), todo (add/list/update), web (search/fetch), and filesystem (ls/read/write/edit/find/grep). There is no meaningful overlap; even fs_write vs fs_edit are clearly separated by create/overwrite vs precise replacement.
All tool names follow a consistent 'domain_action' pattern with snake_case (e.g., memory_add, web_fetch, fs_grep). The verb is consistently after the domain, and every name is lowercase, making the API predictable and easy to navigate.
With 21 tools, the server is slightly above the ideal range but each tool serves a clear purpose across multiple domains (system monitoring, memory, todos, web, filesystem). The count is justified given the broad scope, though a few tools could potentially be consolidated without losing clarity.
The server covers most core operations for its domains—memory and todo have full CRUD-ish coverage, web has search and fetch, and filesystem has read/write/edit/find/grep. However, the absence of a file deletion tool (e.g., fs_delete) leaves the filesystem incomplete, and there is no explicit tool for renaming or moving files. This gap could cause agent failures when cleanup is required.