apply_preset

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations exist, so description carries full burden. It only states 'Apply' without revealing side effects (e.g., overwrites all dials?), reversibility, or permissions. Lacks disclosure of any behavioral traits beyond the action.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

One concise sentence, no fluff. Lists values immediately. Front-loaded with the core action.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a single-parameter enum tool without output schema, the description covers the basic function and options. Missing context on what happens after applying the preset (e.g., modifies current dials). Adequate but not thorough.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, but description names the parameter (preset) via the listed values. However, the schema already provides the enum; description adds minimal extra context (labeling them as 'named presets'). Baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool applies a named preset, with a specific verb (Apply) and resource (preset). It distinguishes from siblings like list_presets or set_dial by indicating it applies a full preset rather than listing or modifying individual settings.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. Does not mention exclusions, prerequisites, or compare with siblings like reset_dials or set_dial. Usage context is purely implied.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.