A
licenseNot graded
qualityC
maintenanceEnables generating, editing, remixing, upscaling, and describing images through the Ideogram V3 API from any MCP client.
33
MIT
tokenhub-aigc-model
by willsygao
Related Servers
Alternatives to tokenhub-aigc-model
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables image generation, editing, and composition using any OpenAI-compatible Images API within MCP clients, Dify, and n8n, delivering results as image blocks, structured fields, or resource links.4MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables image generation and editing using Google Vertex AI's Imagen API through natural language commands in MCP clients like Claude Desktop.371MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to generate and edit images through OpenAI's DALL-E models via MCP tools. Supports text-to-image generation and image-to-image editing with configurable parameters for size, quality, and style.-
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables MCP-compatible AI clients to generate and edit images via the DreamLayer Agent API, including text-to-image, image-to-image, background removal, and upscaling, with support for uploading images and managing execution streams.6168MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceGenerates and edits images via Gemini, Grok, and GPT-image providers for MCP clients like Claude Code that lack native image generation.319MIT
TDQS
A4.1/5.0
Scored across 2 tools
Disambiguation5/5
The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: one generates an image purely from text, while the other edits/generates from 1-16 input images with optional masking. There is no realistic confusion between them.
Naming Consistency5/5
Both tools follow the same tokenhub_<verb>_image pattern with static verb prefixes: edit and generate. The naming convention is consistent and predictable.
Tool Count4/5
With only two tools, the server is slightly thin, but each tool covers a distinct core task in the image-generation domain. The focused scope makes the small count reasonable.
Completeness4/5
The two primary workflows—text-to-image generation and image editing/reinpainting—are covered, and the synchronous design avoids needing result-status tools. A minor gap is the lack of model-list or capability-discovery tooling, but agents can still complete the core tasks.
Maintenance
ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues