Skip to main content
Glama
your-mail-mcp

your-mail-mcp

Related Servers

Alternatives to your-mail-mcp

  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Enables AI assistants to query and manage per-project Outlook mail archives, providing tools to list projects, search emails, and update archives incrementally.
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    An MCP server that exposes a local notmuch email database to an LLM client such as Claude. It is read-first: searching, reading, and understanding mail is always available; writing anything (drafts, tags, exported files) requires an explicit opt-in flag and is confined to clearly bounded locations.
    13
    3
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Exposes an iCloud Mail account through IMAP/SMTP as MCP tools, enabling Claude to read, search, sort, reply to, and archive email from a conversation.
    32 npm
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    This MCP server bridges AI agents with Apple Mail on macOS, enabling email operations like reading, sending, drafting, searching, and scheduling through natural language, with added features like stable draft IDs and confirmation-gated sending.
    61
    32 npm
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Enables LLMs to search and read email from a notmuch archive, providing tools for searching threads, retrieving messages, and listing tags through an MCP endpoint.
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Provides IMAP and SMTP capabilities, enabling developers to manage email services with seamless integration and automated workflows.
    21
    4,221 PyPI
    390
    BSD 3-Clause

Related Servers

  • F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Local IMAP/SMTP MCP server that lets Claude read, search, draft, send, flag, and move mail across multiple IMAP mailboxes. Credentials stay on your machine.
    -
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Local MCP server for multi-account IMAP/SMTP email (iCloud + Gmail via app-specific passwords). Never marks mail read. Cross-folder search, idempotent sends, TLS verified.
    8
    41 PyPI
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Exposes a read-only tag index over a synced personal email archive, letting MCP-compatible agents run fast local searches, browse generated tags, check indexing health, and fetch full thread content for the most promising matches. Built for recall by meaning rather than exact wording, since tags capture topics, people, organisations, document types, and likely misspellings.
    Apache 2.0
  • A
    license
    B
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Connects any number of Gmail accounts to Claude or another MCP client, enabling search, reading, sending, drafting, labeling, and trashing mail across one account or all of them at once. Runs entirely locally, so OAuth tokens never leave the user's machine.
    9
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Self-hosted, multi-account Gmail MCP server for Claude and Codex over Streamable HTTP, with explicit account aliases, owner-only OAuth, and encrypted credential storage. Supports searching and reading email, creating drafts, and optional sending and label changes.
    2
    9
    4
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    MCP server providing read and send access to a single IMAP/SMTP mailbox over Streamable HTTP with GitHub OAuth authentication, featuring recipient allowlists for security, email reading/searching/threading, attachments, drafts, folder management, and sending/reply tools.
    MIT

TDQS

B3.4/5.0

Scored across 11 tools

Disambiguation4/5

Most tools have clearly distinct purposes, especially search, thread, refresh, status, and attachment. There is some overlap among count/files/ids, which all run a query and vary only by output, and show/text both expose message body content, though descriptions make the boundaries mostly clear.

Naming Consistency3/5

All names are short lowercase single words, which keeps them readable, but the set mixes nouns and verbs (folders, ids, status vs refresh, search, show) without a predictable verb_noun pattern. The convention is understandable but not consistent.

Tool Count4/5

Eleven tools is within a reasonable range for a mail search and retrieval server, and each tool maps to a recognizable task. Some granularity may be excessive, since count/files/ids are output variants of the same query and show/text have overlapping body-access roles.

Completeness4/5

The server covers a solid read-only mail workflow: account/folder discovery, querying, message and thread retrieval, attachments, sync, and health status. Minor gaps remain around tag/folder mutation or write operations like composing or deleting, but those may be outside the intended read-only scope.

Maintenance

ActivityActive
ResponsivenessOutdated data