Skip to main content
Glama
wiber

ThetaCog MCP

by wiber
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to ThetaCog MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • AGA-mcp-server

      attestedintelligence
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      This server acts as a Portal (zero-trust Policy Enforcement Point) for AI agents. Every tool call is attested, measured against a sealed cryptographic reference, and logged to a tamper-evident continuity chain with signed receipts.
      15
      52 npm
      MIT

    • agent-gate

      Jott2121
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enforces fail-closed deterministic checks, independent refute-first review, and tamper-evident hash-chained receipts for AI agent outputs before claiming completion.
      4
      3
      MIT

    • numproof

      projecttron
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for deterministic numeric verification and spreadsheet auditing. Enables AI agents to verify math/finance claims, audit rows, and evaluate covenant rules with signed, independently checkable receipts.
      4
      MIT

    • Trust Gate MCP

      CWNApps
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Post-quantum, tamper-evident receipts for consequential agent actions. Provides tools for auditing, gating decisions, and egress classification with quantum-hardened security.
      7
      Apache 2.0
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 12 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct purposes (e.g., detect vs. switch, export vs. open). However, thetacog-status and thetacog-terminal both return room-related information, and thetacog-detect and thetacog-switch could be confused since detect suggests a switching action.

    Naming Consistency2/5

    Naming is inconsistent: most tools use hyphens (thetacog-detect), but two use underscores (pmu_verify, thetacog_overview). This mixing of conventions is confusing and breaks predictability.

    Tool Count4/5

    12 tools is a reasonable count for a cognitive workspace management server. It covers core operations without being excessive, though some tools like thetacog-terminal feel niche.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers major workflows: switching rooms, managing todos, getting status, exporting, and PMU pipeline inspection. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no explicit tool for editing room configurations), but overall it is comprehensive.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources